Back to the Top
Hi PharmPkers,
Since I know that a number of you "imbibe" occasionally :-) , I thought that you might find the
recent paper at the following link of interest:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acer.12355/pdf
There's really not much new in this study in terms of the differences in BAC resulting from
consuming different types of alcoholic beverages. I'd be interested, however, in responses from
"experts" on this list re. the noncompartmental pk analysis undertaken, especially re. the
calculation (and meaning) of MRT and Vss given that alcohol has nonlinear elimination kinetics.
Also, given alcohol's oral administration, wouldn't AUMC/AUC = MRT + MAT (not just MRT)?
Regards,
Peter
Peter W. Mullen, PhD, FCSFS
KEMIC BIORESEARCH
P.O. Box 878
Kentville
Nova Scotia, B4N 4H8
Canada
E-mail pmullen.at.kemic.com
Back to the Top
The authors also calculated relative bioavailability using the AUC ratio method, which assumes
linear and stationery clearance, neither of which is true for etoh. I suspect upon further analysis,
a letter to the editor will be needed.
Bill
William R. Wolowich, Pharm.D., R.Ph.
Department of Pharmacy Practice
College of Pharmacy
Nova Southeastern Universtiy
Ft. Lauderdale, FL. USA
Back to the Top
Hi Bill,
Thanks. I certainly agree with your comments.
I'm somewhat surprised that there's been no response from other PharmPk
list members, given the topic of the paper and the PK analysis described
therein.
- Peter
Want to post a follow-up message on this topic?
If this link does not work with your browser send a follow-up message to PharmPK@lists.ucdenver.edu with "BACs after drinking beer, wine and spirits" as the subject |
Copyright 1995-2014 David W. A. Bourne (david@boomer.org)