Back to the Top
Can anyone tell me oral dose equivalence for subcutaneous scopolamine? I'm
examining the cognitive and electrophysiological responses to cholinergic
drugs in humans.
My question stems from the following: Safer and Allen (Biol. Psychiatry 3
;347-355,1971) suggest that the ratio of oral to i.v. effective dose for
frequency of hallucinations is .aaa. 4 to 1. Intrusion errors on memory tests
linearly increase with doses starting from 0.5mg s.c., but rarely below
(e.g., Wesnes et al, Annals NYAS: 268-271, 1991), whereas Broks et al
(Neuropsychologia 26: 685-700) found a linear increase in memory intrusions
with oral doses of 0.3mg, 0.6mg and 1.2 mg. Other studies have found linear
decrements in cognition (vigilance, memory, sedation) with low oral doses
(0.15-1.2mg; e.g. Parrott, Psychopharm 89:347-54). There is no equivalent
dose response data for i.v. The discrepency could be due to the higher level
of sensitivity of the tasks in the oral studies, but maybe S&A underestimate
oral scopolamine's effectiveness. Alternatively, is s.c. a much less
effective route than i.v. ?
The only PK study I've found is by Putcha et al. (Pharm. Res. 6: 481-5) who
found mean peak plasma concentrations of 0.4mg to be >5 times higher i.v.
versus oral. Can anyone refer me to PK data on s.c. versus oral? Also, can
anyone shed some light on the above results. I know that no relationship
between peak plasma concentrations & cogniton has been established, but
would appreciate any input.
phone: 61 3 9214 5542
Brain Sciences Institute
P.O. Box 218
PharmPK Discussion List Archive Index page
Copyright 1995-2010 David W. A. Bourne (email@example.com)