Back to the Top
Hi,
Recently we have done a CYP IC50 study using 3A4 as a isoform using two
different substrates (Midazolam and testosterone). Interestingly the IC50 values are 5.7 and >20 =B5M for Midazolam and testosterone, respectively for same compound.
My question is why this much difference in IC50 for same compound and what is the mechanism behind this? It will be great if somebody can tell
me some literature about this kind of phenomenon.
Thanks and regards
Regards
Suresh
Back to the Top
The following message was posted to: PharmPK
Hi,
The reason is that these substrates interact with CYP 3A4 at different
sites. Please see the following articles by Steve Clarke et al for more
details:
1. Multisite kinetic analysis of interactions between prototypical
CYP3A4 subgroup substrates: midazolam, testosterone, and nifedipine.
Galetin A, Clarke SE, Houston JB.
Drug Metab Dispos. 2003 Sep;31(9):1108-16.
2.Quinidine and haloperidol as modifiers of CYP3A4 activity: multisite
kinetic model approach.
Galetin A, Clarke SE, Houston JB.
Drug Metab Dispos. 2002 Dec;30(12):1512-22.
3.Multisite kinetic models for CYP3A4: simultaneous activation and
inhibition of diazepam and testosterone metabolism.
Kenworthy KE, Clarke SE, Andrews J, Houston JB.
Drug Metab Dispos. 2001 Dec;29(12):1644-51.
Regards,
David
David Pierce, Ph.D.
Senior Pharmacokinetics Director, Shire
Back to the Top
The following message was posted to: PharmPK
Dear Suresh,
This is not unusual as there are two binding mode/site in CYP3A4 and
both testosterone and midazolam (structurally unrelated) do bind
differently. If your test compound (inhibitor) is competing for one
substrate may not be compete with other with same affinity or avidity
and that can give different values with two structurally different
substrate (probe). That is the reason FDA too recommend to evaluate your
compound by using "Recommend use of 2 structurally unrelated CYP3A4/5
substrates for evaluation of in vitro CYP3A inhibition". If the drug
inhibits at least one CYP3A substrate in vitro, then in vivo evaluation
is warranted.
Hope I answered your query!
Regards
Zainuddin
Want to post a follow-up message on this topic?
If this link does not work with your browser send a follow-up message to PharmPK@lists.ucdenver.edu with "CYP IC50" as the subject |
Copyright 1995-2014 David W. A. Bourne (david@boomer.org)